Pre-purchase · Enumerated answers only

Check the contract without sharing the data.

Eight boundary questions compare your intended use with v1.1.0. No dataset, schema, path, code, identity, account, or free text is accepted. The result is compatibility routing—not an audit and not license acceptance.

Eight compatibility checks

Separate product fit from preparation work and excluded use.

The checker evaluates only these broad selections. It does not infer your schema, inspect bytes, test a join, quote custom work, reserve delivery capacity, or grant a license.

01 What decision do you need the product to support?
02 Which input format must version 1 read?
03 Is Python 3.11 or newer available for local execution?
04 Are decision, event, and availability timestamps explicitly distinguishable?
05 Can the audit inputs use contained relative regular-file paths without symbolic links?
06 Does each declared dataset stay within both v1 hard ceilings?
07 If rows represent aggregate periods, is period completion explicit?
08 Does the intended license cover one legal entity's internal use?

Classification happens in this page. The button sends nothing.

What the result means

Compatibility routing, not a free audit.

Need the evidence behind the boundary?

Read the rule model before requesting a license.